[phobos] FFT

Andrei Alexandrescu andrei at erdani.com
Sun Aug 1 14:55:12 PDT 2010


Sounds interesting. BTW I don't need FFT, but I think such a package 
would be a good addition to Phobos. Would be great if we could 
generalize the code a bit to work with general ranges (random-access I 
suppose, worth exploring to see if less powerful ranges would be enough).

Andrei

On 08/01/2010 03:32 PM, David Simcha wrote:
> Speed-wise, I've just been goofing around for the past hour or so and
> I've sped it up 2x. It now does 1 size 2 ^^ 20 double[] ->
> Complex!double FFT in about 880 milliseconds.
>
> On 8/1/2010 3:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> David Simcha wrote:
>>>
>>> As I am no longer going to use FFTs in my kernel density lib,
>>> improving this FFT code will be bumped down my hacking to-do list.
>>> Does what I have now sound better than nothing by a large enough
>>> margin to warrant inclusion in std.numeric, or does it sound too
>>> primitive to be widely useful? If it sounds worth including I'll
>>> clean up/document the code and send it to the mailing list for
>>> review. If it sounds too primitive, I'll just scrap it.
>>>
>>
>> I don't know enough about FFT's to make any sort of informed comment.
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos


More information about the phobos mailing list