[phobos] [Fwd: Re: What functions could be added to std.algorithm?]

Lars Tandle Kyllingstad lars at kyllingen.net
Sun Aug 8 07:28:26 PDT 2010


If I hadn't been on vacation for the last week, I would've voted 'yes'
too. :)

Welcome, Philippe!  I was vacationing in your home country, btw.  Of all
the countries I've been to, France is probably my favourite -- I just
keep coming back. ;)

-Lars


On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 15:04 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I've followed Philippe's work lately, which seems to be of good quality. 
> I suggest we add him to the roster; he could add great value to the 
> likes of std.algorithm. Please reply either to me or the group with your 
> vote and other thoughts before Tue 23:59:59'99'' CST.
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: What functions could be added to std.algorithm?
> Date: 	Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:32:29 +0200
> From: 	Philippe Sigaud <philippe.sigaud at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: 	digitalmars.D <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>
> Organization: 	Digital Mars
> To: 	digitalmars.D <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>
> Newsgroups: 	digitalmars.D
> References: 	<i33gdn$epd$1 at digitalmars.com>
> <i33up0$15jr$1 at digitalmars.com>
> <mailman.80.1280673176.13841.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>
> <i34p9o$2i42$1 at digitalmars.com>
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 23:34, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org <mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>      I agree that all of the functions you suggested deserve a place in
>      std.algorithm (or std.range). Please add one bugzilla entry or
>      better yet let me know if you'd like to join Phobos's devs (subject
>      to team approval) so you can add them yourself.
> 
> 
> I'd be quite happy to join the Phobos' devs, if they accept me!
> 
> In any case, as Jonathan said, all() and any() are 'bug' 4405. And
> takeWhile is 4535 (as per you suggestion, I added it a few days ago).
> 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4535
> 
> 
> 
>      Also, I agree that std.algorithm has gotten a bit large. Any
>      sensible ideas for addressing that should be discussed. Off the top
>      of my head, I'm thinking that mutators vs. non-mutators could be a
>      possible criterion for separation.
> 
>      BTW, it warms my heart to see that our std.algorithm is the fourth
>      Google hit when searching for std::algorithm (or std.algorithm,
>      which seems to produce the same results). I feel std.container can
>      be a similarly compelling offering. *cough*RBTree*cough*Steve*cough*
> 
> 
> That reminds me I've some questions to ask on recursive containers
> (graphs, trees). I'll try to make a post about it.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos




More information about the phobos mailing list