[phobos] Silent failure of std.container unittests

[Benjamin Shropshire]

Le 2010-07-14 à 22:42, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
>>
>> I agree. But also simple does not mean crappy. I think there's too much talk around a simple matter:
>>
>> ======
>> Assertion failure should abort the current unittest block.
>> ======
>>     

Yes.

>> 4. DESIRED: assert is NOT hacked, any failing assert ends the current unittest, the failure message is printed, execution continues with the next unittest, program ends with error code if at least one assert failed, everybody's happy.
>>
>>     

I want that.