[phobos] Silent failure of std.container unittests

[Sean Kelly]

On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> 
> I think there's a disadvantage there. FWIW changing the semantics of assert that way will translate into a disincentive to use it inside unittests ("Hmm, I better use enforce() here because assert() is just weird.")

Is there a disadvantage in providing a separate routine that reports and doesn't throw?  I know it's another global symbol (assuming it's in object.di), but...