[phobos] Calling abort() on unhandled exception

Sean Kelly sean at invisibleduck.org
Thu Jul 29 21:49:44 PDT 2010


On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:37 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Jul 29, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>>>> I think we misunderstand each other. A file copy program that fails due to, say, the disk being full, should not produce a core dump. It should produce an error message like:
>>>>> 
>>>>> error: disk full
>>>>> 
>>>>> An uncaught exception is NOT an invalid or crashed program in D.
>>>> I think Sean talks about Throwable objects that are not Exception objects.
>>>> 
>>> It's reasonable for seg fault exceptions to produce a core dump. It isn't for recoverable Exceptions, or for non-recoverable ones like out of memory.
>> At the moment, we don't differentiate between seg faults and non-recoverable errors.  Though seg faults are only thrown as exceptions on Windows which doesn't have core dumps anyway, as far as I know. For what it's worth, I was investigating this bug:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4385
> 
> I see. Overall, my opinion is that regular exceptions that escape main(0 should simply print their error message to stderr and exit(1). There should be no stack trace, abort(), core dump, or anything worse than that. Print the string and exit(1). Anything more will force most people to actually insert a try/catch in main to do the simple thing.

I think the stack trace at least should remain.  People have been begging for that for years, and I do think it's pretty useful.  Simply printing an error message says nothing about the context, and it's context that gives error messages meaning.

As for core dumps, if the user wants them for unhandled exceptions rather than just segfaults, there's currently no way to get them with a D app because main() catches everything.  I'm not sure about the merit of failing via abort() vs. returning -1, but I do think it's a nice option to have available.  Personally... I dunno.  I'd mostly want them for segfaults and bus errors, and I can do that with signal handlers.  I'd have to defer to someone else on that.


More information about the phobos mailing list