[phobos] phobos commit, revision 1689

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

I think it should be a property. I followed the convention that stuff 
that doesn't change "this" is a property.

Andrei

On 06/23/2010 09:01 AM, David Simcha wrote:
> Isn't that the point of @property?  I just followed what Andrei was
> doing.  If there's anywhere where I didn't put @property in, it's purely
> an unintentional oversight.  Please let me know and/or fix it.
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Max Samukha <maxsamukha at gmail.com
> <mailto:maxsamukha at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:07 PM, dsource.org <http://dsource.org>
>     <noreply at dsource.org <mailto:noreply at dsource.org>> wrote:
>
>         phobos commit, revision 1689
>
>
>         user: dsimcha
>
>
>     save() is sometimes attributed with @property, other times it is
>     not. Is it really a property? I don't think it is a good idea to tag
>     every function with @property just to make it callable without ().
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     phobos mailing list
>     phobos at puremagic.com <mailto:phobos at puremagic.com>
>     http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos