[phobos] Community shout-out?

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Sun Nov 14 04:55:54 PST 2010


A benchmark has shown that the Tango XML module is a lot faster than many of the XML libraries out there, specially than the Phobos module. So I would say that D could do better than other libraries at least when it comes to speed.

http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs-with-rapidxml/

On 14 nov 2010, at 10:44, Russel Winder wrote:

> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 15:35 +0900, SHOO wrote:
>> About a problem of std.xml.
> 
> Potentially n00b comment but . . . 
> 
> The Python community seem to be giving up on having their own library
> for processing XML and are using bindings to libxml2 and libxslt.  Is it
> likely that a D source XML library can do better than libxml2 and
> libxslt or might it be better just to create a D idiomatic binding?
> 
> -- 
> Russel.
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at russel.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg



More information about the phobos mailing list