[phobos] Plans for std.json

[Jacob Carlborg]

Please don't remove std.xml until we have a replacement. 

On 28 okt 2010, at 23:11, Jesse Phillips wrote:

> Some of the items I recall are:
> 
> std.bind (There was something related to this, might have been removal)
> std.boxer (std.variant)
> std.date (std.datetime)
> std.conv (std.convert)
> std.socket/stream (going to have a new design)
> std.xml (redesign, removal until good replacement?)
> std.json
> 
> At least some mention of what will happen to these should be placed in
> the documentation.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> How about all the other parts that are intended to be deprecated but
>> haven't been flaged as such?  Same question applies.  The json code
>> shouldn't be singled out.
>> 
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> 
>>> I agree that we should add a mention. Other opinions?
>>> 
>>> Andrei
>>> 
>>> On 10/28/10 2:14 CDT, Brian Schott wrote:
>>>> The DMD 2.050 beta zip contains no mention of std.json being scheduled
>>>> for eventual replacement. Is it really a good idea to have another
>>>> release with this code included and no warning that it will eventually
>>>> go away?
>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.
>   - George Bernard Shaw
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg