[phobos] next release

[Yao G.]

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:25:26 -0500, Jonathan M Davis  
<jmdavisprog at gmail.com> wrote:

> [snip]

Hi Jonathan.

I recently came across to this bug report you did about adding more  
comprehensive unit testing functions:

> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4653

The thing is, I did something similar to unit test my Boost date time  
library. I have a module with a few unit testing methods, similar in name  
to the JUnit library:

> http://bitbucket.org/gomez/yao-library/src/tip/src/yao/unittesting/assertions.d

Unfortunately, my asserEquals function is almost the same as yours. I just  
wanted to let you know that I didn't stole from your module. :) However,  
if you think that is too similar, I can give you some attribution. I just  
don't want another licencing issue like the Tango affair.

By the way, I have completed, some days ago, the time module from the  
Boost datetime library port. The only missing component is LocalDate and  
all the TimeZone paraphernalia:

> http://bitbucket.org/gomez/yao-library/src/tip/src/yao/datetime/core.d
> http://bitbucket.org/gomez/yao-library/src/tip/src/yao/datetime/date.d
> http://bitbucket.org/gomez/yao-library/src/tip/src/yao/datetime/time.d

The yao.datetime.time module lacks unittesting and documentation, but I'm  
working on that.


-- 
Yao G.