[phobos] phobos commit, revision 2032

Brad Roberts braddr at puremagic.com
Sun Sep 19 18:31:08 PDT 2010


Which is exactly why I suggested that 2.050 try to focus on fixing bugs
involving work arounds.  Obviously, it requires buy-in from Walter (and Don),
and a list of bugs that are particularly annoying.

My list is pretty much just one bug:

  http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516
  Destructor not called on temporaries



On 9/19/2010 3:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> One important advantage we have in working on Phobos is that we have Walter on
> board, who can help us. I think we should convince Walter of giving priority to
> bug 3534 and then undo this diff.
> 
> Andrei
> 
> On 09/18/2010 04:00 PM, dsource.org wrote:
>> phobos commit, revision 2032
>>
>>
>> user: dsimcha
>>
>> msg:
>> Bug 4888:  Heavy reliance on Bug 3534 in Phobos range usage.  I used a
>> different approach here than the first one I tried.  I only did what was
>> necessary to make Phobos work instead of trying to fix the deeper issue of
>> making std.algorithm to work w/ const/immutable arrays.
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2032
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos



More information about the phobos mailing list