[phobos] Initial Phobos style guide proposal

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 1 apr 2011, at 04:49, Brad Roberts wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Walter Bright wrote:
> 
>> On 3/30/2011 8:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> These are intended to be general guidelines which are followed most of the
>>> time but can be broken within reason (though hopefully that's relatively
>>> rare).
>>> 
>> 
>> I'd like to see this as changes (as necessary) to the D style guide
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dstyle.html, not as something distinct and
>> possibly in contradiction with it.
> 
> I see the same thing happening this time that has happened during last 
> discussions.  There's a core part that's agreed upon, but it's 
> overshadowed by the discussion about the parts that aren't, and nothing 
> happens.  I highly suggest getting the agreed upon parts captured in an 
> appropriate doc.  The above one would be fine by me.
> 
> It's far easier to add rules to an existing list once it exists.
> 
> My 2 cents,
> Brad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos


That sounds reasonable to do. Put in the things we can agree on and leave the rest out.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg