[phobos] OS X lib32?

Steve Schveighoffer schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 28 10:19:29 PDT 2011


Might this be a good point to split the downloads into OS-specific bundles?  Like every other application/tool?


-Steve




>________________________________
>From: Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com>
>To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
>Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 11:04 AM
>Subject: Re: [phobos] OS X lib32?
>
>Le 2011-03-28 à 1:38, Walter Bright a écrit :
>
>> There's a conflict with the "mac way" and the "unix way". I'll have to agree with Michel that on the mac we should do it the mac way.
>
>By this, do I understand that the next release will return to using "lib" instead of "lib32". If so, that's great. Thanks.
>
>Here's what I'll do on my side. I'll make an exception in my installer so that if it downloads DMD 2.052 it automatically adds a symlink at "osx/lib" pointing to "osx/lib32". This will make things work for this release. The downside is that it won't work if the user installs DMD manually by unpacking the archive at the right place, but if the next DMD release return to using "lib" the problem will be limited to manual downloads of DMD version 2.052, which shouldn't be too bad.
>
>-- 
>Michel Fortin
>michel.fortin at michelf.com
>http://michelf.com/
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>phobos mailing list
>phobos at puremagic.com
>http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>
>


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20110328/a70b462d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the phobos mailing list