[phobos] auto tester feedback requested

[Jesse Phillips]

I suppose one question is what information is most useful for quick glance.

The history?
The state of a particular architecture?
The component?
The operating system?

Operating system is definitely one.
I think the architecture of the binary is another, though for an
developer probably the produced executable is better.

You could also have a side bar which provide a history summary of all.

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> I'm re-working the pages in preparation for freebsd 64 bit builds to be added, hopefully this weekend.
>
>  http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/index-new.ghtml
>
> I'm not sure I like not having more history right on the front page like the old/current version.  All too often lately
> we've had intermittent failures.  Showing only the most recent hides that awfully easily.  What I'm considering
> something like a stack of little boxes that are purely green or red (no text) beside the most recent run's full details.
>  A little like this awful text version to illustrate:
>
>  +----------------+ +--+
>  |  current run   | [p1]
>  |  checkout      | [p2]
>  |  dmd           | [p3]
>  |  druntime      | [p4]
>  |  phobos        | [p5]
>  +----------------+ +--+
>
> I could do away with the individual box per build config model, but I rather like it... or at least I'm used to it.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>



-- 
Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.
  - George Bernard Shaw