[phobos] Tag for the dmd 2.053 release on the Phobos repository?

Jonathan M Davis jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Sun May 15 04:14:57 PDT 2011


On 2011-05-15 04:08, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 15 maj 2011, at 11:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On 2011-05-15 02:07, Michel Fortin wrote:
> >> Le 2011-05-15 à 4:06, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
> >>> On 2011-05-15 00:39, Russel Winder wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:31 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >>>> [ . . . ]
> >>>> 
> >>>>> I believe that git-push --tags will push the tags, so you probably
> >>>>> need to run something like
> >>>> 
> >>>> Isn't git-push somewhat out of date, shouldn't that be git push?  ;-)
> >>> 
> >>> Both are valid. There's nothing out-of-date about either.
> >> 
> >> $ git-push
> >> -bash: git-push: command not found
> >> 
> >> $ git push
> >> fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
> >> 
> >> $ git --version
> >> git version 1.7.2.2
> >> 
> >> Clearly one works and the other doesn't for me. It used to work with
> >> earlier versions. Which version of git do you have?
> > 
> > It's probably a PATH issue. I have git version 1.7.5.1. Depending on your
> > distro, it may or may not have the git-* files in your PATH. On Arch,
> > they're in /usr/lib/git-core, and I had to add that to my PATH. If
> > you're on Windows, I don't know what you need to do to get them to work.
> > The git bash shell doesn't have them by default, and I haven't spent
> > enough time in Windows to make it worth figuring out how to make them
> > available.
> 
> I found them in /opt/local/libexec/git-core on Mac OS X.
> 
> > I prefer the git-* commands though, since you get command completion with
> > them. Also, the man pages use those names. But it is true that your
> > distro may not have set it up so that they're on the PATH. But you
> > should be able to get them to work but just figuring out which directory
> > they're in on your system and adding them to your PATH.
> 
> I'm pretty certain that you should get command completion with the "git
> command" syntax as well.

Really? I don't generally expect command completion to work if it's not part 
of the executable's name.

- Jonathan M Davis


More information about the phobos mailing list