[phobos] Parallel reviews of TempAlloc and std.path?

[Lars Tandle Kyllingstad]

My proposal for a new std.path is now ready for review, and it is my
understanding that the same is true for David's TempAlloc.  Would it be
OK if we run the reviews in parallel?  The two are completely
independent, and AFAIK TempAlloc is meant for druntime, not Phobos.


For the curious/impatient:

https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/new-std-path/std/path.d
http://www.kyllingen.net/code/new-std-path/phobos-prerelease/std_path.html

-Lars