[phobos] std.process and std.datetime - circular dependency on OSX

[Benjamin Shropshire]

On 10/02/2011 03:52 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> How about:
>
> --
> pure static this()
> {
>   // Code
> }
> --
>

pragma(depends, module1, modle2) static this() {
}

That would imply that whatever is imported, this one only depends on the 
listed modules.

> That is, pure at module level (doesn't depend on any other modules). 
> Ordering can be done as before, we just need to add a clause in the 
> docs to define pure module constructors as being run first given a 
> "cyclic dependancy".
>
> On 2 October 2011 23:42, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com 
> <mailto:jmdavisProg at gmx.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Sunday, October 02, 2011 14:49:26 Walter Bright wrote:
>     > On 10/1/2011 9:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>     > > It would be really nice though to be
>     > > able to just somehow mark one or both of the static
>     constructors or
>     > > modules to indicate that the initialization order doesn't
>     matter (or to
>     > > tell it which order to use if that's a better solution).
>     >
>     > If such a feature were added, it would not be allowed in @safe code.
>
>     Well, it does kind of scream @trusted, since you're telling the
>     compiler that
>     what you're doing is safe instead of the compiler figuring it out
>     on its own.
>
>     - Jonathan M Davis
>     _______________________________________________
>     phobos mailing list
>     phobos at puremagic.com <mailto:phobos at puremagic.com>
>     http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Robert
> http://octarineparrot.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20111004/2fdf2e34/attachment.html>