<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 16:21, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lars@kyllingen.net">lars@kyllingen.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 03:24 -0500, Yao G. wrote:<br>
> I did a quick dive on Johnathan code, and I think it's<br>
> superb. I think it deserves a review, because it could be a better<br>
> candidate to inclusion that mine. I'll continue porting the Boost date<br>
> time library, because as I'm using it on my own code, but obviously the<br>
> better one should be picked.<br>
<br>
</div>I haven't had time to really test Jonathan's code, but I've looked at it<br>
and I agree it looks very good. Which one is the better of Yao's and<br>
Jonathan's, I cannot say. They both have their strengths, and neither<br>
is complete yet.<br>
<br>
Perhaps we should ask for a vote on the NG?<br></blockquote><div><br>Is it too late for them to merge their code?<br><br><br>Philippe <br></div></div>