[Robotgroup] Parallel ports and water flow

[Shane Geiger]

FYI:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laminar_flow




Paul Atkinson wrote:
> Gray,
>    
>   I don't think you'll have a problem if you aren't susceptible to jitter between pulses (as stepper motors are.) 
>    
>   You may have to have a special driver (giveio) or something like that to access the parallel port under Win XP/NT/2k if memory serves. 
>    
>   The opposite of laminar flow is turbulent flow.
>    
>   Paul
>
> Gray Mack <gray_mack at yahoo.com> wrote:
>   I was very successfully using a parallel port on an
> old windows 95 machine for programming PIC controllers
> and now want to move that to an windows XP machine
> with a usb-to-parallel port gadget. It uses clocked
> data to the flash so not as speed dependent as a motor
> but there are some limitations. I wonder if there will
> be any problems with that???
>
> Also, whats the opposite of 'laminar flow' science,
> I.E. making the biggest even liquid bubbles in air? Or
> is this just another form of laminar flow?
> -Gray
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Robotgroup mailing list
> Robotgroup at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/robotgroup
>
>
>  		
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
>  Next-gen email? Have it all with the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> _______________________________________________
> Robotgroup mailing list
> Robotgroup at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/robotgroup
>   

-- 
Shane Geiger
IT Director
National Council on Economic Education
sgeiger at ncee.net  |  402-438-8958  |  http://www.ncee.net

Leading the Campaign for Economic and Financial Literacy