[Robotgroup] Triangulation using a Rich Skyline Telescope
Clendon Gibson
bsandyman at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 2 18:33:20 PST 2008
This is much like the 'navigation' that was used for the Voyager space probes. I put navigation in quotes because they didn't really do course changes so much as use a precise knowledge of position and orientation to aim the camera and other sensors.
Basically V-GER always knew roughly where certain stars where. When it needed to check position it would swing the camera around to look at them and make any fine adjustments needed.
As a refinement to the rich skyline telescope, make some of the lights different colors.
----- Original Message ----
From: Bruce Waters <biwaters at austin.rr.com>
To: robotgroup at puremagic.com
Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2008 7:05:58 AM
Subject: [Robotgroup] Triangulation using a Rich Skyline Telescope
I
agree
with
others
who
have
mentioned
the
difficulty
of
achieving
the
accuracy
(centimeters)
at
the
costs
allowed
using
classical
RF
triangulation.
If
you
are
willing
to
consider
a
rather
dramatic
modification
of
the
beacons,
you
might
find
meeting
those
specs
more
realistic.
My
approach
would
be
to
use
a
large
number
of
led's
(eg.
Christmas
light
strings)
nonuniformly
arranged
around
the
boundary(or
elsewhere)
to
provide
a
high
angular
resolution
"skyline".
To
reduce
ambiguity
it
is
important
to
insure
that
the
interlight
spacing
not
be
excessively
uniform.
I
would
use
a
cheap
telescope
(with
a
right/left
pair
of
light
edge
sensors
at
the
focus)
at
the
same
height
as
the
led's.
I
would
sweep
or
rotate
the
telescope.
I
would
train
the
robot
on
the
spacing
of
the
led's
from
some
known
near-central
point.
I
would
move
the
robot
directly
at
some
specific
led
beacon(a
non-rotating
second
telescope
might
facilitate
this)
and
develop
a
mathematical
(initially
tabular,
then
add
sophistication)
model
of
the
variations
in
angles
to
the
rest
of
the
skyline.
I
would
return
to
the
central
point
and
pick
some
number
of
additional
headings
to
train
the
bot.
Consider
mounting
the
telescope
low
and
using
software
techniques
to
ignore
the
wheels.
Learning
the
skyline
allows
very
low
precision(just
string
chunks
of
it
around
the
boundary)
initial
placement
the
skyline.
It
allows
software
improvements
to
accuracy
and
data
volume
requirements.
It
provides
an
angular
resolution
related
to
the
telescope
power
and
the
number
of
led's
in
the
skyline.
It
allows
local
incremental
improvement
of
the
resolution
by
adding
skyline
in
appropriate
places.
It
is
an
interesting
continuing
project
to
improve
the
performance
without
spending
more
on
hardware.
It
can
be
wonderfully
cheap
for
the
performance
delivered.
A
valuable
improvement
you
should
consider
is
an
elevation
tracking
gimbal
mount
for
the
telescope
to
reduce
the
exaggerated
sensitivity
to
tilt
of
the
robot
and
vertical
variations
in
the
skyline
as
the
telescope
rotates.
The
light
sensor
for
this
improvement
should
be
upgraded
to
at
least
four
quadrant
and
could
go
(fast,
low
res)
video.
Note
that
the
skyline
does
not
have
to
be
continuous
but
that
precision
does
require
that
adjacent
beacons
be
visible
at
angles
that
are
not
too
acute
in
several
major
compass
headings.
Just
like
radio
beacons,
chance
light
sources
in
the
skyline
may
be
used
as
beacons
in
some
cases
so
your
robot
may
function
adequately
in
some
environments
without
additional
beacons.
The
elevation
control
and
perhaps
a
zoom
control
on
the
telescope
can
greatly
enhance
such
serendipitous
operation.
The
flexibility
and
adaptability
of
this
approach
is
outstanding.
It
is
a
wonderful
platform
to
explore
fuzzy
logic,
data
volume
reduction
techniques,
and
high
reliability
software
concepts.
Bruce
Waters
_______________________________________________
Robotgroup
mailing
list
Robotgroup at puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/robotgroup
More information about the Robotgroup
mailing list