No subject


Sat Jan 19 22:50:23 PST 2008


http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/01/ethics_of_auton.html

Comes this article:

--------------------------- CLIP ----------------------------
January 28, 2008
Ethics of Autonomous Military Robots

Ronald C. Arkin, "Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a
Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture," Technical Report
GIT-GVU-07011. Fascinating (and long: 117-page) paper on ethical
implications of robots in war.

Summary, Conclusions, and Future Work

This report has provided the motivation, philosophy, formalisms,
representational requirements, architectural design criteria,
recommendations, and test scenarios to design and construct an
autonomous robotic system architecture capable of the ethical use of
lethal force. These first steps toward that goal are very preliminary
and subject to major revision, but at the very least they can be viewed
as the beginnings of an ethical robotic warfighter. The primary goal
remains to enforce the International Laws of War in the battlefield in a
manner that is believed achievable, by creating a class of robots that
not only conform to International Law but outperform human soldiers in
their ethical capacity.

It is too early to tell whether this venture will be successful. There
are daunting problems remaining:

* The transformation of International Protocols and battlefield ethics
into machine usable representations and real-time reasoning capabilities
for bounded morality using modal logics.

* Mechanisms to ensure that the design of intelligent behaviors only
provide responses within rigorously defined ethical boundaries.

* The creation of techniques to permit the adaptation of an ethical
constraint set and underlying behavioral control parameters that will
ensure moral performance, should those norms be violated in any way,
involving reflective and affective processing.

* A means to make responsibility assignment clear and explicit for all
concerned parties regarding the deployment of a machine with a lethal
potential on its mission.

Over the next two years, this architecture will be slowly fleshed out in
the context of the specific test scenarios outlined in this article.
Hopefully the goals of this effort, will fuel other scientists’ interest
to assist in ensuring that the machines that we as roboticists create
fit within international and societal expectations and requirements.

My personal hope would be that they will never be needed in the present
or the future. But mankind’s tendency toward war seems overwhelming and
inevitable. At the very least, if we can reduce civilian casualties
according to what the Geneva Conventions have promoted and the Just War
tradition subscribes to, the result will have been a humanitarian
effort, even while staring directly at the face of war.
-------------------------- /CLIP ----------------------------

PDF referenced can be found here:

http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/formalizationv35.pdf

in case the above is broken:

http://tinyurl.com/2g69vj

Vern

-- 
Vern Graner CNE/CNA/SSE    | "If the network is down, then you're
Senior Systems Engineer    | obviously incompetent so why are we
Texas Information Services | paying you? Of course, if the network
http://www.txis.com        | is up, then we obviously don't need
Austin Office 512 328-8947 | you, so why are we paying you?" ©VLG
_______________________________________________
Robotgroup mailing list
Robotgroup at puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/robotgroup 



More information about the Robotgroup mailing list