[Robotgroup] challenge

[Shane Geiger]

I assume this mailing list has some people who are somewhat prejudiced 
against considering these ideas, but I also know there are plenty of 
intelligent people on this mailing list who will take my challenge to 
tell me what is wrong (if anything) with this analysis:

Freefall Acceleration of WTC7: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=POUSJm--tgw 
(10 minutes)
 (This analysis is shockingly easy to understand and shocking.  It is 
worth noting that other independent evidence strongly suggests the very 
same thing:  This is a controlled demolition.)

Good luck.

Shane

-------

MY WTC7 FACTOID:

World Trade Center Building Seven (WTC7) was not even mentioned in the 
9/11 Commission Report.  It was a 47-storey high-rise steel structure 
that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is now 
trying to claim came down due to fire.  It came down in 6.6 
seconds--basically the speed of freefall.  After the first day of TV 
coverage, you did not see this building on TV anymore.

WTC 7 "Collapse":  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A (9 seconds)

Freefall Acceleration of WTC7: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=POUSJm--tgw 
(10 minutes)
 (This analysis is shockingly easy to understand and shocking.  It is 
worth noting that other independent evidence strongly suggests the very 
same thing:  This is a controlled demolition.)

WTC7 - Incriminating evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ&NR=1
 (Listen to people mentioning beforehand that the building is about to 
blow up.)

9/11 Truth: Why Won't The Media Show World Trade Center 7?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgJuHNfk7no&NR=1
 (NINE minutes of video on WTC7.  This is very good.)

WTC videos of "collapse":
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html

WTC-7 Any Questions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM


-- 
Shane Geiger
IT Director
National Council on Economic Education
sgeiger at ncee.net  |  402-438-8958  |  http://www.ncee.net

Leading the Campaign for Economic and Financial Literacy