[D-runtime] Bug 3150: requires changes to rt/lifetime.d
Sean Kelly
sean at invisibleduck.org
Fri Jul 23 09:47:57 PDT 2010
That's why I never changed it myself :-) The compiler needs to be changed to use the new functions.
On Jul 23, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
> I have a problem here. If I change a function that returns a ulong to having it
> return an Array struct, the compiler expects the caller to push a reference to
> the return value on the stack, where it doesn't do that when returning a ulong.
>
> Easily demonstrated with this code:
>
> testlongtoarray2.d:
> struct Array
> {
> size_t length;
> ubyte* ptr;
> }
>
> extern(C) Array callme()
> {
> Array d;
> d.length = 5;
> d.ptr = null;
> return d;
> }
>
> testlongtoarray.d:
> extern(C) ulong callme();
>
> void main()
> {
> ulong x = callme();
> }
> [steves at steveslaptop testd]$ dmd -gc testlongtoarray*.d[steves at steveslaptop
> testd]$ gdb testlongtoarray2
> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (6.8.50.20090302-40.fc11)
> Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
> and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i586-redhat-linux-gnu".
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /home/steves/testd/testlongtoarray2
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x08049073 in callme (__HID1=0x180fc4) at testlongtoarray2.d:9 <------ note the
> hidden argument which is garbage!
> 9 Array d;
> Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.10.2-1.i686
> (gdb)
>
> What's happening is that main is simply calling the function without pushing
> anything on the stack, but the implementation expects that the reference to the
> return value is on the stack.
>
> Does this make any sense to anyone? What should I do here? I can't really
> change what the compiler expects the return value to be.
>
> -Steve
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Don Clugston <dclugston at googlemail.com>
>> To: D-runtime at puremagic.com
>> Sent: Fri, July 23, 2010 5:31:04 AM
>> Subject: [D-runtime] Bug 3150: requires changes to rt/lifetime.d
>>
>> Fixing this bug will be important for 64 bits:
>> 3150 cast from dynamic array to ulong is allowed
>>
>> As discussed in the comments to that bug, a change is required at two
>> places in druntime, because druntime currently relies on the compiler
>> bug. I don't think it's particularly difficult, but I don't want to do
>> it myself. Can one of you guys take care of it?
>> _______________________________________________
>> D-runtime mailing list
>> D-runtime at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime
More information about the D-runtime
mailing list