[D-runtime] druntime commit, revision 410

[Sean Kelly]

Please let me know what you think about core.time.  My only worry is about the potential overlap with std.datetime, but it's hard to do without any structured time representation in druntime.  Should any attempt be made to have the duration type in std.datetime be compatible with this? should the names be made different so there are no collisions in user code? etc?

On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:09 PM, dsource.org wrote:

> druntime commit, revision 410
> 
> 
> user: sean
> 
> msg:
> Added core.time, which has a Duration type used to communicate time periods to relevant routines in druntime.  Right now, Thread.sleep() is the only method that accepts a Duration, but the routines in core.sync will be modified to do so as well if core.time passes muster.
> 
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset/410
> 
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime