[D-runtime] [phobos] Use of X86 and X86_64 in druntime and phobos

Alex xtzgzorex at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 10:21:04 PST 2011


Hi,

Already done :)

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/93
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/335

Regards,
Alex

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Sean Kelly <sean at invisibleduck.org> wrote:
> Please submit patches.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Alex <xtzgzorex at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've noticed an annoying trend in druntime and phobos of using the X86
>> and X86_64 version identifiers to make _bitness-dependent_ decisions.
>> Some code goes along the lines of:
>>
>> version (X86)
>> {
>>    ...
>> }
>> else version (X86_64)
>> {
>>    ...
>> }
>> else
>>    static assert(false, "Unknown platform");
>>
>> In some cases, the assert isn't even present, so you just end up with
>> compile errors that you need to go and investigate.
>>
>> There's also code such as:
>>
>> version (X86)
>> {
>>    ...
>> }
>> else
>> {
>>    ...
>> }
>>
>> (Notice the unconditional else clause.)
>>
>> This makes porting of druntime and phobos to non-x86 architectures a
>> massive pain; there are so many places that need to be checked by hand
>> or they won't work correctly on either 32-bit or 64-bit architectures
>> (and in some cases, you won't get any error at compile-time, but
>> rather observe a runtime crash).
>>
>> I realize most non-DMD compilers maintain their own druntime/phobos
>> trees, but one has to keep in mind that upstream druntime/phobos are
>> merged into these regularly. I believe it is in everyone's best
>> interest if we stop abusing architecture version identifiers as
>> bitness version identifiers. IOW, use D_LP64 instead of X86 and
>> X86_64.
>>
>> If we can agree on this, I'll gladly submit some patches to both
>> projects to sort this out.
>>
>> (I ran into these issues while building GDC as an ARM cross-compiler.)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>> _______________________________________________
>> D-runtime mailing list
>> D-runtime at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>


More information about the D-runtime mailing list