[D-runtime] druntime should be a shared library/DLL
Sean Kelly
sean at invisibleduck.org
Thu Feb 21 09:20:38 PST 2013
On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario at gmx.de> wrote:
> What you lose with compiling the C runtime into the D DLL is sharing it with a C host or DLL. If this gets ported to Win64 and the MS runtime, it might be more important because it seems more common to use the shared MS-CRT.
This. I'd prefer if the library construction and application build process were consistent between Win32 and Win64. Why bundle the DLL in 32 bit and leave it out in 64?
More information about the D-runtime
mailing list