Mac OS X 10.5

[Carlos Santander]

Anders F Björklund escribió:
> Carlos Santander wrote:
> 
>>> Why are you using the FSF GCC, rather than the Apple GCC ?
>>
>> I guess I'm used to it, I find it easier to use, and I get to use the 
>> same steps when I build on Ubuntu. Plus, 
>> http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/ doesn't show Leopard yet.
> 
> Right, Xcode 2.4.1 and 3.0 has not been released (yet?).
> 
> I used FSF GCC 3.3.x on Panther, but eventually gave up
> on FSF GCC 4.x.y with Tiger since it didn't really work.
> 
> But having both available would be great, so keep it up! :-)
> 
>> I guess I should've asked: what are the differences between the two
>> GCCs? What benefits does the Apple version provide? I guess it fits
>> better with the OS, or something like that, but I'd like to know 
>> specifics.
> 
> Some of it is language support (Objective-C++ for Tiger
> and Objective-C 2.0 for Leopard), it also has more support
> for old operating systems quirks - both Mac OS and NeXTstep.
> And not sure if FSF GCC supports the SDKs and -isysroot yet ?
> 
> There's a lot of changes, the diff between them is now huge...
> 
> --anders

Well, I'm a Mac OS X user, not Mac OS or NeXTstep (what a weird spellng...), so 
I don't care about that. I don't know what -isysroot is; I remember seeing it 
somewhere, but I don't think I've missed it. And I don't know what you mean by 
supporting the SDKs. I've used -framework to use Carbon, Cocoa, Mono, and 
perhaps others, and they've worked just fine. Am I missing something?

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal