object.di error

[Johannes Pfau]

Am Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:36:22 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com>:

> Yep, anything 'class' related won't work without object.di and
> probably much more. But to make a app using those features link,
> object_.d needs to be compiled in as well, and that pulls in some
> druntime dependencies (not too many), so to ship a minimal working
> object.di we'd also have to ship a minimal 'runtime' library. I'm not
> sure what's the right decision here, but it'd be great if could make
> a minimal compiler work for C-like code with minimal dependencies
> (one object.di file shipped by default definitely counts as minimal
> dependencies though).

I guess we should just keep everything as it is. A minimal runtime
seems too much effort right now and for testing very basic
functionality it's always possible to create an empty object.di.