version statement problem in gdc

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-04-08 22:17, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 8 April 2013 17:55, John Colvin <john.loughran.colvin at gmail.com

>     So, overall, it's not gonna happen unless dmd changes its
>     implementation of inline asm?
>
>
>
> Pretty much.  Though given that what you have changed is in rt folders,
> I think the intent is that each compiler maintains its own, so it
> wouldn't be difficult just to re-implement using extended assembler.

How does GCC implement its inline assembler. What's the difference 
compared to how DMD implements its own?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg