Debugging "missing callgraph edge for call stmt"
Iain Buclaw
ibuclaw at ubuntu.com
Thu Jan 3 10:10:09 PST 2013
On 3 January 2013 17:38, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:
> Am Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:47:00 +0000
> schrieb Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com>:
>
> > On 3 January 2013 16:12, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Then there's the question why the outer function has to be a
> > > template as well for this to happen: It's because if it's not a
> > > template, gdc uses a completely different code path: There's a
> > > "!gen.functionNeedsChain (f)" check in outputFunction which is false
> > > for the failing case. (cgraph_finalize_function marks the function
> > > as reachable)
> > >
> > >
> > That might be just it then...
>
> I admit I don't really know why this check is needed but even if I try
> to call cgraph_finalize_function for indirectLess the backend dies with
> the same error. Actually my statement above was wrong,
> cgraph_finalize_function only marks the function as reachable if it's
> TREE_PUBLIC/. The not-templated case works even without
> cgraph_finalize_function so that's not the issue.
>
>
I would have thought that it be a little more factors than that. Remember,
TREE_PUBLIC only means whether or not the function is callable outside of
the module we are compiling (TREE_PUBLIC=0 means that the function is not
marked as global in the assembly output).
I think it would be a mixture between what DECL_CONTEXT is set for the
affected functions, and the order that the functions generated are passed
to cgraph_finalize_function.
> >
> > I have been rolling round my head to remove the notion of functions
> > nested in functions within the D codegen. Having only RECORD and
> > UNION types set in DECL_CONTEXT. So all public functions are
> > TREE_PUBLIC=1 (unless there's some overriding attribute), and all
> > nested functions are TREE_PUBLIC=0.
>
> I see! That's why percolateDown is public, but isn't it essentially a
> nested function in the test case?
>
>
What I said was an idea that *could* be implemented, but is not yet.
See ObjectFile::setupSymbolStorage for why templates are public by
default...
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/d.gnu/attachments/20130103/bbe42ed2/attachment.html>
More information about the D.gnu
mailing list