gcc 4.8 snapshot

[Iain Buclaw]

On 11 March 2013 08:36, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com> wrote:

>
> On Mar 10, 2013 11:41 PM, "John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, 8 March 2013 at 18:45:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8 March 2013 18:37, John Colvin <john.loughran.colvin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is there any way of knowing the correct snapshot to compile with at any
> >>> given time? It's a pretty lengthy trial and error process to find
> out....
> >>>
> >>
> >> I normally update my gcc snapshot once every fortnight.  If there's any
> >> compilation issues let me know.  But I hardly run into any, if at all...
> >
> >
> > I downloaded the most recent snapshot (03/03) and gave compiling a go.
> After fiddling around getting mpc mpfr and gmp3 recognised, I ran in to
> this:
> >
> > In file included from
> /Users/johncolvin/Git/gdc/gcc_for_gdc/gcc/d/dfrontend/mars.c:109:0:
> > d/verstr.h: In constructor ‘Global::Global()’:
> > d/verstr.h:1:2: error: ‘n’ was not declared in this scope
> >  -n "2.062"
> >   ^
> > d/verstr.h:1:4: error: expected ‘;’ before string constant
> >  -n "2.062"
> >     ^
> >
> > This is on OS X 10.7, patch 2.5.8, gmp 5.0.5, mpfr 3.1.1, mpc 1.0.1, GNU
> Autoconf 2.69, GNU automake 1.13.1, flex 2.5.37, GNU Bison 2.7, GNU patch
> 2.7.1, gcc/++ 4.7.2
>
> I guess that would be stupid OSX doesn't have an  -n switch for echo.
>
> Feel free to send a patched Make-lang.in file. But I have an idea of what
> instead to use.
>
>
>
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/e55a446b8465476ec7eda23edb44d4591eed2627


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/d.gnu/attachments/20130311/9f224084/attachment.html>