GDC updated to use 2.065

[Iain Buclaw via D.gnu]

On 14 June 2014 02:39, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject.org> wrote:
> On 13 June 2014 23:59, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject.org> wrote:
>> On 13 June 2014 08:23, Johannes Pfau via D.gnu <d.gnu at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>> Am Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:57:01 +0200
>>> schrieb "Joseph Rushton Wakeling via D.gnu" <d.gnu at puremagic.com>:
>>>
>>>> On 12/06/14 00:50, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>>>> > Bleeding edge, see gcc.version which has the snapshot version of gcc
>>>> > this was last tested and verified against.
>>>> >
>>>> > However if the last conversation I had with Johannes was of any
>>>> > indicator, if you hold onto your horses, you may find this
>>>> > backported to work on 4.9.x in the next weeks. :-)
>>>>
>>>> I have no horses to hold, but Johannes' work is always worth waiting
>>>> for :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> No need to wait any longer, I already pushed the updated gdc-4.9 branch
>>> yesterday.
>>>
>>> Binary builds will be delayed until
>>> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12900
>>> is fixed. I'd also recommend to delay linux distribution package
>>> updates but I hope that bug will be fixed soon.
>>
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3662
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/91835c9e4f8787d2b347a19540e091744fca416f
>>
>> I would daresay all good to go.  But I am aware of a couple of bugs
>> compiling realworld software (eg: vibe.d, and apparently dub?)
>
> OK, fixes pushed to get dub and vibe working against gdc....
>
> Any other high priority bugs that need fixing? :)

If anyone is privileged enough to have gdc with 2.065 already, then
I'd like to suggest trying out dub and building all packages in
http://code.dlang.org using it, using various different compiler
flags, and report back any bugs found (with nice minimal cases I'd
hope)

Regards
Iain