master branch broken

[Brad Roberts]

On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau <nospam at example.com> wrote:
>> See
>> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13
>>
>> (Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete gdc
>> rebuild to happen)
>
> Hmm, didn't see that either.

Has the minimum base gcc version moved forward again?  Why isn't the GDC repo a fork of gcc rather 
than depend on a tarball to apply on top of?  Currently the auto-testers are using this snapshot: 
4.9-20131201.