D as first class language in the gcc milestones ?

[ketmar via D.gnu]

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:44:20 +0000
"Ledd via D.gnu" <d.gnu at puremagic.com> wrote:

> My point being that for the majority of people, the ones that
> work on open source projects, large projects, productions for the
> masses, a stable language and a predictable release cycle, is
> more valuable then a cutting-edge feature-reach language .
so they can take a stable language with predictable release cycle and
so on. C, for example. D must change faster, not slower. i can't see
why i should lose features which makes D valuable for me to please
imaginary future adopters.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/d.gnu/attachments/20140928/845fee87/attachment.sig>