version?

[John Colvin via D.gnu]

On Monday, 20 February 2017 at 17:00:48 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> The next gcc release ought to be an interesting experiment for 
> the community, as although the version is still set to 2068, 
> gdc has now diverged so far from the last C++ sources that it 
> is anything but. I'll probably bump it to whatever version of 
> phobos it can compile. :-)

Is there a possibility that gdc will continue to diverge? I don't 
necessarily think that's a bad thing, if upstream features can be 
implemented in a timely manner (that's a big "if" though).