Modules named "object" with DMD 0.153

[Hasan Aljudy]

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> It isn't perfect, but it appears there is now a way to have modules 
> named 'object' or at least according to a cheap little test I just ran.  
> The trick is to explicitly import 'object' in your own 'object'.  Let me 
> show you what I mean:
> 
> # module test;
> #
> # private import std.stdio ;
> #
> # private import foo.object ;
> #
> # void main () {
> #   FooObject foo = new FooObject ;
> #   writefln("%s", foo.toString);
> # }
> 
> # module foo.object;
> #
> # import object;
> #
> # class FooObject : Object {
> #   public char[] toString () { return "<<FooObject>>"c; }
> # }
> 
> This compiles and runs fine for me, DMD 0.153 on Windows.
> 
> -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

but this module is foo.object, which is totally different from object.

There shouldn't be a problem with creating a module foo.object, it 
wouldn't conflict with object anyway. At least that's what I think.