ANNOUNCEMENT: GNU-D opens up shop

[Boris Wang]

Yes, the license is not most important. The most import is the that many 
professional developers
can take part in, improving the compiler and library, and not only a 
watcher.

And now, Walter is an "autarch", the others just suggest, suggest, suggest, 
and the result nobody known.

May be Brad, you can

-------------------------
I'm not a expert of D, and even a newbie on development of windows.


"Brad Roberts" <braddr at puremagic.com> 
??????:Pine.LNX.4.64.0604281914330.2422 at bellevue.puremagic.com...
> An odd statement, since GNU has nothing to do with Apache or Firefox.
> Linux does use the GNU license, and the OS's that build on top of the
> kernel use a ton of GNU tools, which are important, sure.  But let's try
> to leave religious debates (licenses, editors, etc) out of this, they're
> counter productive.
>
> What D needs is people to _do_ stuff, not just talk about.  Work together
> to improve what exists.  Don't fork off and start new, competing, projects
> and websites.  Find something that exists already and improve upon it.
> If something that needs to exist but doesn't, sure, start something new.
>
> We don't need yet another wiki site.  We don't need yet another project
> repository.  We do need people contributing to both.  If you have issues
> with how a part of the community is running, let's work to improve it.
>
> So, wanna help?  Do something, but do it constructively.
>
> Later,
> Brad
>
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Boris Wang wrote:
>
>> Without GNU, Without the miracle of Linux, Apache, Firefox.
>>
>> We need a miracle of D, and GNU can make it.
>>
>>
>> "Hasan Aljudy" <hasan.aljudy at gmail.com>
>> ??????:e2u4ob$v42$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>> > I'm not a big fan of GNU, and I don't think that GNU-izing D is for the
>> > best interest of the language.
>> > Let's be realistic: For D to succeed, it has to be used for commercial
>> > projects. The big guys in the market must embrace it.
>> >
>>
>>