DMD 0.177 release

[Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email)]

Kirk McDonald wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
> 
>> There's also the consistency issue, that if construction is done with 
>> 'this()' for classes it should be done with 'this()' for structs.
>>
> 
> One issue I have with allowing struct constructors is that the existence 
> of struct constructors implies the existence of struct destructors. Do 
> we really want to go that far? Though "static opCall" doesn't scream 
> "constructor," it also doesn't seem to imply the user could define a 
> destructor. I submit that "this()" would.

Who knows, maybe D will have destructors for structs one day :o).

Andrei