DMD 0.170 release

[Ivan Senji]

Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Added foreach_reverse, which addresses a serious shortcoming.
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> 
> foreach_reverse addresses a serious shortcoming? What is that, if 
> instead of:
>   foreach_reverse(Foo f; aggregate) { ...
> I can do:
>   foreach(Foo f; &aggregate.opApplyReverse) { ...
> 
> The latter form is both more general (allows any kind of iterators) and 
> more simple/orthogonal (no extra special statements are needed).
> 

Hmm, does foreach(Foo f; &aggregate.opApplyReverse) work/can be made to 
work if aggregate is Foo[]?

If not, then I think foreach_reverse is useful.