DMD 0.170 release

[Russ Lewis]

J Duncan wrote:
> Vladimir Kulev wrote:
> 
>> Agree with you, foreach_reverse is unnecessary feature, so it should not
>> exist.
> 
> Disagree with you, its a nice thing to have.

Could we make the statement that the old construct
	foreach(int i; a) {...}
is now considered to just be syntax sugar for:
	foreach(int i; a.opApply) {...}
and similarly for foreach_reverse?

If so, then really the question here is whether we think this syntax 
sugar is worth having.

Russ