DMD 0.170 release

[Tom S]

Tom S wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> Did you mean
>>    foreach (c; reverse(foo)) ??
>> I guess so.  it does seem to compile that way.
> 
> Actually I meant foo.reverse. It compiles and runs fine on .169

Uh, sorry about that... I forgot about the built-in .reverse for arrays 
and it seems that it was being used in this case. Indeed, it should be 
reverse(foo).