One way to look at foreach as not so bad

[Tom S]

Julio César Carrascal Urquijo wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> Maybe I can get used to this version that works now:
>>     obj.each( (int i) {
>>       wrietfln(i);
>>     })
>>
>> But it just looks weird to have my loop body inside the parens, and 
>> will look even weirder if nested
>>     obj.each( (Obj c) {
>>       c.each( (int i) {
>>         writefln(i);
>>       })
>>     })
> 
> I don't understand your point. You can already write something like:
> 
> obj.each = (int i) {
>     writefln(i);
> };


Yup, or

obj.each in (int i) {
     writefln(i);
};

But it will only look like a loop of some sort. Neither continue, break 
nor return will work in its body.
The trailing delegate extension would make life easier *hint* *hint* ;)