Is DMD 0.166 RC 1.0?

[Chris Nicholson-Sauls]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Any compelling reason why not? I know that everyone (including me) wants 
> more features, more improvements, etc., but nothing about calling it 1.0 
> will prevent that from happening.

Why not: IFTI needs polish, array literals are just too valuable (although IFTI helps here 
too), Phobos needs a std.array (templatized!), need to resolve current enhancement/feature 
requests and suggestions -- aka, any new requests from "This Point" forward are tagged for 
the next release, but anything currently on the table needs to get resolved to one of "not 
going to happen", "will happen and here's how", or "deferred to next release because it 
just can't be done and here's why".

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls