The D Programming Language by Andrei Alexandrescu

[Robert Fraser]

David Wilson wrote:
> Plus, that area still seems to be seeing rapid evolution. It'd be
> pretty terrible if we ended up with some syntax in 2.0 for an
> experimental feature that could end up being the "const debate" of
> 3.0, simply by jumping the gun before the technology has stabilized
> enough to be generally useful.

IMO, the syntax Bartoz presented at the conference was fine.