DMD 1.005 release

[Walter Bright]

Yauheni Akhotnikau wrote:
> May be I'm wrong, but I think that 'static if' and recursive templates 
> (and other techniques available for metaprogramming at compile time) are 
> not as powerful as ordinary D itself. So it is much more preferable to 
> me to program such DSL as 'normal' D program. May be it is a good idea 
> to make 'staged' compilation? For example DSL transformation code is 
> written as ordinal D programm. Then that code compiled at first 
> compilation stage, then it is invoked by compiler and the result is 
> placed into input to the next stage.

The main difficulty is if the DSL needs to access symbols in the rest of 
the D code.