DMD 1.017 release

[BCS]

Reply to Walter,

> Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> 
>> Valid logic, but what about the common case of 'int f = 42;'?  Maybe
>> the rule should be that .init is either a /literal/ initializer's
>> value, or a CTF initializer's value, or else the type's .init value.
>> (I can recall having once or twice relied on a variable's .init being
>> something particular.)
>> 
> How about, if it isn't a compile time constant, then using .init is an
> error?
> 
> I think that if CTFE fails, having it silently revert to the
> type.init, would be frustratingly obscure behavior.
> 

vote++