GDC release 0.23

[Frits van Bommel]

Lionello Lunesu wrote:
> David Friedman wrote:
>> If I do implement it as a primitive type, how do you suggest I mangle 
>> it  and the imaginary/complex variants?  Should there be an 
>> 'implementation specific extension' mangle character?
> 
> I'm not following this discussion 100%, but if "double double" is only 
> needed for interfacing with C, then why would you need the 
> imaginary/complex variants?

Google for "_Complex _Imaginary C99" (without the quotes).
C99 added some keywords to support complex & imaginary types.