0ffh wrote: > Walter Bright wrote: >> Yes. If you're using boxer, take a serious look at variant, and see if >> that works for you. > > It's as good as incorporated in Drat! already... =) > BTW news://news.digitalmars.com:119/ff393g$2mqk$1@digitalmars.com ? Well, std.boxer isn't going to be deleted. It may get moved to etc.boxer.