FlowerScirpt teaser

[eao197]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:41:27 +0400, Alexander Panek  
<a.panek at brainsware.org> wrote:

> 0ffh wrote:
>> Alexander Panek wrote:
>>> 1) Ruby isn't so slow as most people want it to be.
>>  Whoever might /want/ Ruby to be slow (apart from GvR and LW)? :)
>> More important is, IMHO, that execution speed is not everything.
>> It just needs to be fast enough to do the job, and often it is.
>
> Exactly! As mentioned before in this thread: in most cases the database  
> is a lot slower than the Ruby application - let alone when you run it on  
> a quad core Xeon with 20 Mongrels or so. *shrug* :P

There is an interesting presentation about really large Web-applications  
and Ruby:  
http://jxh.bingodisk.com/bingo/public/presentations/JHoffmanRailsConf-Berlin-Sept2007.pdf

-- 
Regards,
Yauheni Akhotnikau