DMD 1.027 and 2.011 releases

[Christopher Wright]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Graham St Jack wrote:
>>> It would work just like "nothrow" does for C++.
>>
>> Just checking - I hope this means that if a nothrow function actually 
>> DID try to throw an exception (by calling something that throws), 
>> compiler-
>> generated code would trap it and terminate the program with an error 
>> message?
> 
> No, but it will try to detect errors at compile time.

And nothrow will be a valid part of a delegate signature, correct? So I 
can use nothrow with delegates.

Nothrow is especially tricky because it doesn't require a function call 
to get an exception. But those cases are relatively rare.