DMD 1.027 and 2.011 releases

[Graham St Jack]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:36:34 -0800, Robert Fraser wrote:

> Graham St Jack wrote:
>> It will be a good trick if you can pull it off. I don't see how it can
>> be done without examining the source code of all the called functions,
>> leaving us back where we started with throw specs.
> 
> I think the idea would be that nothrow is part of the function signature
> and a nothrow function can only call other nothrow functions or wrap any
> function calls or news in a catch(Exception) (since there's no way to
> know specifically which exceptions could be thrown).

That would work, but my feeling is that it would be so restrictive that 
hardly any functions could be nothrow.